The oligopoly and the CRTC compromise on a deadline that's too little too late. It shouldn't take 18 months! How about July 2006 for Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto, Calgary and Ottawa and March 2007 for the rest of the country? That would be something that would almost be acceptable. Corporations always talk about the need for world class infrastructure and taxes; how about putting their money where their mouth is and implementing world class mobile number portability sooner rather than later?
From CRTC Shortens Wait Time for Number Portability - Michael Geist.:
QUOTE
The CRTC yesterday issued its much-anticipated decision involving the implementation of wireless number portability. The Commission mandated number portability by March 14, 2007, about six months faster than the industry proposed, though not exactly the "expeditious" implementation that the government called for last February.
UNQUOTE
Comments
Getting closer
cool
Reduce the confusology quotient
After receiving a high enough bill (such as when a child uses minutes beyond the limit at which the insane prices start) people will be more likely to switch (after paying appropriate switching fees) to a competitor. This will introduce real competition which should improve service offerings for everyone.
The big guys will try to fight this using "bundling" options (Cell phone, regular phone, long distance, internet, cable, GPRS, other) to create additional layers of confusology. However if they increase the confusology quotient too high they will canibilize their own sales. Many consumers think they already are getting HD on their cable.
I'm looking forwards to when a Skype phone using WIFI can replace expensive Cell phones.
+1 on voice over WiFi on your mobile phone
Post new comment