New York Times to charge non print subscribers to access their "distinct voice"
Is it just me or is this an understatement in humility :-) ?!? Regardless, I won't be paying for the NYT for their "distinct voice". I'd rather continue to pay for the Gruber and the Kottke and the Bird (Shelley I'd love to pay where do I sign?), etc. whose voices are much more distinct than the mostly cr*ppy NYT voices.
From PaidContent.org: May 16, 2005 Archives.:
QUOTE
On closing the gates: "The vast part remains open and free but our distinct voice is now a pay product."
UNQUOTE